Luckily, I’ve discovered a poem that seems, in my eyes, very similar to Marin Sorescu’s Laughing Disease. It’s called “Diagnosis” and it’s written by one Sharon Olds:
By the time I was six months old, she knew something
was wrong with me. I got looks on my face
she had not seen on any child
in the family, or the extended family,
or the neighborhood. My mother took me in
to the pediatrician with the kind hands,
a doctor with a name like a suit size for a wheel:
Hub Long. My mom did not tell him
what she thought in truth, that I was Possessed.
It was just these strange looks on my face—
he held me, and conversed with me,
chatting as one does with a baby, and my mother
said, She’s doing it now! Look!
She’s doing it now! and the doctor said,
What your daughter has
is called a sense
of humor. Ohhh, she said, and took me
back to the house where that sense would be tested
and found to be incurable.
A bit different, I know, but so is the author. Still, was the above a true story? From Wikipedia:
A reviewer for The New York Times hailed her poetry for its vision: "Like Whitman, Ms. Olds sings the body in celebration of a power stronger than political oppression." Alicia Ostriker noted Olds traces the "erotics of family love and pain." Ostriker continues: "In later collections, [Olds] writes of an abusive childhood, in which miserably married parents bully and punish and silence her. She writes, too, of her mother's apology 'after 37 years', a moment when 'The sky seemed to be splintering, like a window/ someone is bursting into or out of'"
..furthermore..
In 2005, First Lady Laura Bush invited Olds to the National Book Festival in Washington, D.C. Olds responded, declining the invitation in an open letter published in the October 10th, 2005 issue of The Nation. The letter closes: "So many Americans who had felt pride in our country now feel anguish and shame, for the current regime of blood, wounds and fire. I thought of the clean linens at your table, the shining knives and the flames of the candles, and I could not stomach it".
Here’s another one:
The Sisters of Sexual Treasure
As soon as my sister and I got out of our
mother's house, all we wanted to
do was fuck, obliterate
her tiny sparrow body and narrow
grasshopper legs. The men's bodies
were like our father's body! The massive
hocks, flanks, thighs, elegant
knees, long tapered calves–
we could have him there, the steep forbidden
buttocks, backs of the knees, the cock
in our mouth, ah the cock in our mouth.
Like explorers who
discover a lost city, we went
nuts with joy, undressed the men
slowly and carefully, as if
uncovering buried artefacts that
proved our theory of the lost culture:
that if Mother said it wasn't there,
it was there.
Doesn’t it have something of the violent exploration and sexual primitivism of “playing butcher”? Well, anyway, certain forms of portraying love are far more acceptable when coming from women than from men. Olds can certainly be as iconoclastic, sarcastic and ironic as Sorescu:
The Pope’s Penis
It hangs deep in his robes, a delicate
clapper at the center of a bell.
It moves when he moves, a ghostly fish in a
halo of silver seaweed, the hair
swaying in the dark and the heat — and at night
while his eyes sleep, it stands up
in praise of God.
I’ll leave you with
Sex Without Love
How do they do it, the ones who make love
without love? Beautiful as dancers,
gliding over each other like ice-skaters
over the ice, fingers hooked
inside each other's bodies, faces
red as steak, wine, wet as the
children at birth whose mothers are going to
give them away. How do they come to the
come to the come to the God come to the
still waters, and not love
the one who came there with them, light
rising slowly as steam off their joined
skin? These are the true religious,
the purists, the pros, the ones who will not
accept a false Messiah, love the
priest instead of the God. They do not
mistake the lover for their own pleasure,
they are like great runners: they know they are alone
with the road surface, the cold, the wind,
the fit of their shoes, their over-all cardio-
vascular health--just factors, like the partner
in the bed, and not the truth, which is the
single body alone in the universe
against its own best time.
Sources / More info: inbo, wiki
Așeaa... ;
ReplyDeleteȘi?
Opinia... unde e opinia hautorului dă post?!?
Mă rog, pricep că e dă dat limbi... e vizibil;
înțeleg prezența pisicii - "... și noi este animale..." alea.
Da' unde-i concluzia?
Articololul e despre o poetesa. Concluzia ti-o tragi singur, cum am stabilit in FAQ :P
ReplyDeleteCa să mă secspim în esperantos:
ReplyDelete"EXKREMENTOS"!
Ceva mai liberalo-lesbianic n-ai găsit?
Să pretinzi că se leagă de Sorescu... e obrăznicie dă curcubeu.
Hai, mai bagă ceva care se relatează la Eminescu, da' e conectat la nambla.
Hai că poți, ce dreaq'... ai bacaloriatu' la bază...
N-am bac, c-am terminat liceoul in Canada.
ReplyDeleteCumva, detectez o umbra de ostilitate & bitterness in spusele tale..
Aha...
ReplyDeleteDeci, n-ai bacu' luat.
Și io... care credeam că ejti 'telectual.
Mea pulpa, mea maxima p.
Dacă ai ajuns acilea... după hani și hani dă zile... să ocluzionezi detecție dă hostilitate... hapăi TAICĂ...
Mai du-te și la doctor, că cică e gratis la canadieni.
Mai te cauți... una-alta... vezi dacă te califici la poiana lu' Iocan.
te-ai cam self-radicalizat 'talica. mai asculti muzica de fanfare? :)
ReplyDeleteAș putea cu ușurință să-ți întorc complimentul; ce muzică ascult n-are treabă cu ce comentez.
ReplyDeleteÎn schimb... ce SCRII TU are legătură strănsă cu ce e în capu' tău.
Radicalizarea e cu dus-întors... în general, se referă la alde d-ai tăi, gen... stângaci, comuniști, socialiști, apărători dă țigani și propovăduitori dă renunțare la etică și moralitate.
Bine zice fiu-meu de la facultate alaltăieri în scrisoare: vezi, tânăr tânăr, dar copt, serios băiat! zice: „Tatițo, unde nu e moral, acolo e corupție, și o soțietate fără prințipuri, va să zică că nu le are!..."
Comentariile tale nu sunt SCRISE DE TINE (ca sa ma exprim cu fervoarea ta)? Iar daca muzica pe care-o asculti n-are nicio legatura cu cine esti si nu te afecteaza / reflecta, de ce o asculti?
ReplyDeleteNu comentez cu ce zici de stanga.. :)