matricola, emblem of communist kontrol and privacy

It recently occurred to me that in my article about the school uniform, I forgot to mention perhaps its best known and most hated feature: the number every student was supposed to wear on their uniform. It’s much like what students wear these days of their own accord: Abercrombie, Adidas, Parasuco, Lululemon, Joe Fresh, Smythe, Guess, but it also had a supposedly unique number and it was compulsory.

matricoleThis little piece of communist history is only important because it was one of the most irksome features of school life in that place and time. At the beginning of the year, we each got one, dutifully recorded by diriga in a list (or the “catalogue” – where teachers kept a record of all our efforts, academic successes and failures). The boys were supposed to wear it on their jacket sleeve, above the elbow, while girls had to have it on their breast, as you can see in the photo in the article on uniforms.

Now, the article with the communist uniform, discussing the influence of slim-fit pants and published May 6, was good enough as it was. And on May 7, this amazing pearl:

I can only hope that micro-Kim is not [the sole] reader of this blog. Either way, I had written this article before discovering the tweet (via Petreanu).

I hated this school emblem and hated its idea. It wasn’t enough that my individuality was melted into the collective through the uniform, now I had to be serialized, much like a prison inmate who had never committed a crime except that of having been born. ‘Twas a stark reminder that I was nothing but a prisoner of the education system in the communist lager.

The “reasonable” explanation behind this tag was that if a pupil was to engage in anything worth reporting, while outside the school or inside, anyone could report them to the school by their number. This was, however, wishful thinking because nobody bothered reporting and besides students were not wearing it when causing mischief (and if they were, but it was too hard to read). One had to have it sewn to the uniform, and that was checked when you would get into the school, but nobody would check if it was truly your number or not. You could always find one on the floor and use it instead of the one assigned to you, with no-one being the wiser. Besides, although we were all regularly engaging in “mischief” outside the school, as kids do, I have never heard of someone having been reported to the school for it. Inside the school, you were known by your name (at least I was). Being the tallest and youngest in my class wasn’t helpful in my situation. Outside the school, people would throw things at you – for instance, climbing a fruit tree for cherries, apples or anything else caused some weird inhabitant to throw water on you (usually dirty).

In a nutshell, “matricola” (the tag) was not useful for its official purpose. I suspect that it had a different effect, whether purposely or accidentally: it got people accustomed to being a cog in the infernal communist bureaucracy, a termite with little purpose outside that given by the state. Having to wear a tag made everyone much more agreeable to having “identity papers”, a CNP or SIN or any other kind of identifying number. It also made people more accepting of having their privacy invaded by the government and less likely to question security theater, in all its forms and manifestations, including having to provide CNP for registering a .ro domain name (ROTLD).

This indirect purpose seems to have been achieved. If you read comments from people reminiscing about their school years, even at the “matricola” posting on fb, here’s what you’ll find (and this theme keeps being repeated throughout):

Marin Elisabeta Mama le cosea pe carton si eu o prindeam cu ac de siguranta pe dedesubt, ca sa pot sa o scot! Eram o adevarata rebela!

Razvan Fcd Cococi o prindeam cu capse si o scoteam la filme :)))

Tudorita Margineanu Danculea si ce cafteala de la diriginta nu mai spun de uniforma daca nu era sub genunchi

Luciana Bulzan-lupescu eu trisam..era prinsa cu scai..cind plecam de la scoala o luam jos..Ami dadeam jos repede saronacul..aveam haine de schimb tot timpul la mine

Anaya Heaven Doamne fereste, sa lucrez in invatamant! Dar pe vremea aceea era teroare in sensul cuvântului. Acum ce este, ... mai râu! Dar.... ce ati semanat aia culegeti. Cine a permis ca elevii sa meargă cum vor, când vor si cu ce vor la şcoala?

Emma Emilia Tudorache ...poate daca nu le am fi smuls cu totii tara asta ar fi fost mai buna si unii dintre noi mai constienti de cat de importante sunt educatia, respectul si mai presus de valorile materiale pe care acum le veneram!

Ella Ella le aveam prinse in capse si dupa ce intram in clasa le aruncam de la etajul doi la colegii care nu aveau si le prindeau cu agrafa

Balcanu Jonny-Elena asa este pacat ca nu isi dau seama ce rau le fac tot elevilor cresc fara un pic de respect, eu am luat bataie de la profesori cu linia de lemn peste maini sau te trageau de urechi pana se inroseau si cand ajungeam acasa nu aveam curaj sa spun nimic la parinti ca ma bateau si ei asa ca tebuia sa invat,

Daniela Dumitru cit de frumos erea si cit respect se inpunea pentru cei care purta emblem uniforma sub genuchi nyu ca acuma pina la cur de se vad chiloti dear putea sa vina desbracate si pe urma spun ma violat pai de ce nu tu dai prilezu nu am dreptate.

Personally, I fought it with every fibre of my being. First, I wore it with an elastic band, so that I could easily take it off after control. I had stapled the elastic band with a stapler and needless to say, that didn’t work well and would fail in time, having had to repeatedly be reattached. I then moved to more permanent “staples” in each corner, as I could not find velcro anywhere.

Despite all the crap I got from diriga, I never affixed it permanently to my uniform. And that, my friend, is one of my childhood’s proudest achievements.

Sources / More info: fb, gcclg

17 comments:

  1. For us, it was just a threat. It never materialised and we never wore it :P

    ReplyDelete
  2. What year(s) are you talking about and what grade(s)?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Primary School - 1994/1998?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interesting. So they kept the tag, but didn't enforce wearing it? That made for a more dramatic security theater :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. In our school, anyway (we had a more ''modern version'', similar to an urban badge...it still looked awful, though :P).

    ReplyDelete
  6. These days, you're simply tracked by smartphone: http://inbonobo.tumblr.com/post/74859655042/the-journal-article-focuses-on-happy-child-a

    ReplyDelete
  7. Which is not necessarily a bad thing, if the tracking is simply a security measure (a failsafe, in case something goes awry) and not a way for parents, teachers or authorities to constantly "know" where the child is.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's never good, even as a security measure, because the potential for abuse exceeds the potential rewards for the individual. That's what the article on security theater (link in text) tried to show.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It did try to show that, but as always, it starts with the assumption that most individuals are rational enough and have a decent amount of education. It starts with the assumption that most individuals are fully aware of themselves and their interactions.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh, but they are and they have - for their own standards :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm talking about 10 year olds :))

    ReplyDelete
  12. .."for their own standards" :)


    (unless you're talking about 10 yos low in self-esteem)

    ReplyDelete
  13. ariely ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPQhj6ktYSo ) vs branigan ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8-pP4VboBk )

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ma uit pe moment la prima, dar nu garantez ca o sa gasesc acolo raspunsul. Too much to watch, too little time :P (pana acum e in zona mea de confort primul - daca o sa ajunga la partea in care "taking risks is necessary", cred ca stiu unde bate - si nu unde bateam eu cu discutia, cu-atat mai mult cu cat ma gandeam de la bun inceput la un "fail safe" option, nu la supraveghere non-consensuala si continua - eu zic ca se poate :P).

    ReplyDelete
  15. Eh, nu-i musai sa te uiti la toate astea, dar Ariely are in general chestii interesante de zis.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Pus acolo la bookmarks, sa urmaresc cand am putin timp :)

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for commenting, but comments entered in this version may not appear.
Felicitări pentru decizia de a comenta! Orice comentariu este bine-venit :).
Din moment ce vezi acest mesaj, accesezi pagina printr-o metoda alternativa si este posibil sa comentezi neobservat(a). Metoda preferabila este prin pagina normala, care contine Disqus; odata inregistrat, acesta iti permite sa comentezi prin reply la email.
Dacă ai intrebări, există răspunsuri - FAQ.
Baftă!